PRESS
2007
180
Magazine
Martin Cooper Interview and Artist Feature
25 FEB, 2006
25 February, 2007 MARTIN
COOPER INTERVIEW FOR 180 Tell
us a bit about your background and where you are now? A short biography... A few years later, I only applied to one college, Parsons, and was accepted. During my senior year in college, Calvin Klein was my critic, and I would later work for him in the later 80s and early 90s. Throughout, Marie Essex continued her mentorship with me until she passed in the mid-90s. Marie introduced me to my wife Karen in 1990. In 1994, I left Calvin Klein to work for Burberry, the British luxury goods company, where I am currently Design Director of Outerwear for the brand worldwide. After commuting back and forth from New York to London for 13 years, Karen and I recently moved to London 7 months ago.
I was a late bloomer in discovering photography, though when I look back, photography was always a part of my life. I am completely self-taught. I happened to stumble into photography because around 1990, I wanted to produce a photo-based book project about women, done by women. My role would be financier and art director to the project, but the team would be all female. Karen and I interviewed models and photographers for months, frankly without feeling that we had communicated the essence of the imagery certainly to the prospective photographers. Because of this frustration or inability to show a photographer...this is what Im looking for, I approached one of our best friends at the time and asked her if she would agree to be my guinea pig in an attempt to shoot (nude) images with her on a Polaroid camera that I could then ultimately show a to photographer...this is what Im looking for. Jane agreed, and was an excellent first model. I think its important for an artist, especially a figurative artist, to find people along the way during the very first stages of their creative development who believe in their vision or have a certain level of trust where that friend is willing to be a collaborator and model for that artist. I worked with Jane for several months shooting Polaroids on a Spectra camera, and Karen, in all of her wisdom, just said why dont you shoot the project yourself. That project was never realized, but the exercise actually served me better. It was just the right push of confidence that I needed to begin exploring my own voice as a photographer. I would have never thought in a million years at the time that I would start an artistic exploration in photography, and more particularly the nude as a genre. After all, Im a fashion designer. 16 years later, I now love the fact that by day I spend my energies creating a language of clothing to dress and adorn the body, but by night, I reduce the layers and affectations down to the nude. What
are your areas of specialization? Tell us about that field? Any hints?
What do you need to shoot it? For instance, if it's fashion or commercial
do you use a team approach? Figurative art, especially where photography is concerned, is a relationship between an artist and a model that is based on trust. Im always fascinated about that relationship because it is also symbiotic, meaning that both artist and model work closely for a duration of time for the mutual benefit of both. The artist cannot express his ideas without the collaboration of the model. And the model cannot perform without the audience of the artist. With every project that I work on, one model always emerges out of the pack that typifies the essence of what that project or series is about, and the work is ultimately built around her. Were
you always interested in these or have you changed your focus? I usually work alone with the model, and have done so for years. I do all of my own tech and styling and prefer this to a team. I like the intimacy of working one-on-one. I recently tried working with an assistant, but found it less productive for me. We film all the shoots in the studio for the historical record, so that adds an additional person to the mix. My wife Karen has filmed most of the shoots over the years. On another note, I am married to a very exceptional woman. She is quite involved in my work publicly and privately. In the beginning, Karen did all of my casting. Now she plays a more background approach as advisor and sounding board. I think it is important for male photographers to involve their partners in their work on some level, because if she is not a supporter, your work will go nowhere. Are
you making a living at photography? Any hints for those starting out on
how to make a living? As a fine
art photographer, it was important to find gallery representation earlier
in my career. I found that search very much about being in the right place
at the right time. Over the years, Ive had a number of galleries
represent my work, and perhaps, I always pulled the short straw and spent
all my energies chasing gallerists to get paid, verses concentrating on
producing the work. This by the way is an extremely common story among
artists. The good thing about having gallery representation is that the
work is seen in public. I have now chosen a slightly different model in
the form of a private dealer. A private dealer is someone who does not
exhibit work in a public space, but rather in a private space. An office.
Usually dealers are known to move work. They usually have
very strong relationships with art buyers and sell work very consistently.
Since moving to this model 6 or 7 years ago, I havent had any financial
issues, but of course, a private dealers biggest limitation is that
they dont work out of a public space. There is no foot traffic
to speak of. It also helps that you build your career before you really
approach a private dealer, or gallerist for that matter, so that you already
come to them with a loyal following for your work. A dealer or gallerist
will not invest in building your career at that level. Who
are your clients now? Where
do you see yourself in 5 years?
How
did you get into this subject?
Historically, I prefer to work with the same models over and over again. Most photographers prefer to work with a new face or model each time they pick up the camera. Im the opposite. I feel that the longer I work with a model, the stronger the images become. I would say that there is a core of perhaps 10-12 models that Ive been collaborating with for over 10 years. They have essentially grown up in front of my camera and they all have tremendous ownership about their collaboration with my projects. For me, it is a large investment when I take on a new model, because of the consistency I need throughout my work. If I hadnt told you that The Altis series spanned 10 years, you would never know it. Some of the models are 10 years older from one image to the next, but they look the same. When I pick a model, I can usually tell what type of longevity shell have with my work. During the time I was casting for The Altis series, I was very upfront with a model about the commitment she needs to make toward our collaboration. Many models pose nude for an artist as a fluke onetime thing, or to fulfill a fantasy, make their husband/ lovers jealous, etc. Its very important to know why a model has come to your studio. Its your job to find out. If I feel its a financial thing, I tell them its not the project for them (btw, I do pay my models, and never do time in exchange for prints, but freely give prints on a merit basis). If I feel its a curiosity thing, I tell them this is not the project for them. I love a model that understands why she has chosen to be in my studio and present herself in the nude. That she understand how her body moves in space. And I love a performer. I never seek a model for a sense of perfection. Perfection is so unapproachable. I like character and something that makes her both real and ideal at the same time. She doesnt have to be experienced at all, but its everything to me if she wants to be part of the creative process and build images together in a collaborative way. CONCLUSION Do
you have an overall style or aesthetic for your photography? Im very much a non-technical photographer. I know this about myself, so I felt right from the beginning that I needed to focus my tools (camera, lens, light, film, paper) and streamline the choices so that I can concentrate on creating the work, and not get bogged down with the process. I spent several years researching 19th century toning recipes. The challenge was that the chemistry was essentially the same, but the papers are different today. So it took much trial and error to find the right chemistry combination to work with modern day paper. Tonings, especially split tones where I can achieve more than one color within a single image, became my forte. All of my images are black and white, but quite colorful in that 19th century way. This is all analog photography. There is no digital darkroom work in my photographs. I shoot with 2 large format Sinar cameras; a 4x5 and 8x10, and I only shoot with Polaroid films. Though a certain discipline is attached to large format work; nonetheless, it keeps it simple at the same time. Any
final advice for young photographers? The way that that phrase has helped me is that Im now focusing on 2 new projects that Im intensely passionate about. One is about the Human Pelvis and why I feel its the most fascinating and controversial bone in the human body and the other is an exploration into a controversial 19th century historical figure, and will be quite a point of departure from my pervious projects. Both projects, and certainly the later, involve much more risk taking on my behalf than ever before. Im owning my freakness.
|